🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Maybe one bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that big changes need to happen.