🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. In recent weeks, WHO officials sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the legislation is approved.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We exist in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The company was “not against rules”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be shielded from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.